Monday, October 24, 2016

Justin Trudeau's First Year as Prime Minister!


Justin Trudeau, One Year In 
Published on Oct 19, 2016
It's the first anniversary of the Liberal Party's sweeping federal election victory. The Agenda assesses how Justin Trudeau has fared as prime minister. Are the days of "sunny ways" over as he has settled into the difficult job of running the country? 

Justin Trudeau's First Year | At Issue  
Published on Oct 21, 2016
The panel gives the Liberal government its one-year report card.

One year in: Top 5 ways Trudeau and his Liberals are ruining Canada  
Published on Oct 19, 2016
Brian Lilley provides a run-down of the top five ways Justin Trudeau and the Liberals are ruining Canada one year into their majority government.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on his first year in office  
Published on Oct 19, 2016
Is the honeymoon ending or is the best yet to come? Prime Minister Justin Trudeau joins BT Montreal to discuss the challenges his government is facing, and its accomplishments so far.

Evan Solomon on Justin Trudeau's first year as PM          
Published on Oct 20, 2016
Anyone who says the Liberal government hasn't accomplished anything in 12 months is wrong, says Evan Solomon, but Justin Trudeau's looming challenges are enormous.

Joe Rogan Educated on Stupidity of Justin Trudeau.  
Published on Oct 19, 2016
This clip was taken from the Joe Rogan Experience. Joe Rogan goes from liking Canadian PM Justin Trudeau for being a"Young, Smart, Boxer with really nice hair" to recognizing he is the king of the Social Justice Warriors. Great discussion of the open floodgates of Immigration, and the SJW tactic of labeling their detractors "Islamophobes".
Gad Saad, informs Joe that Trudeau is the "Kingpin of the Ostrich Brigade". This puts him as the head of the nonsensical "ostrich with their head in the sand" crowd that have hijacked all our Socialist countries and are working overtime to take down America to the same fate. Saad explains Muslim Human Rights violations that are consistently forgiven and accepted, by Liberal Regressives who prioritize 'Diversity' and 'Tolerance' over real equality. Of course these buzzwords, are only SJW code for Anti-White, Anti-Western Culture.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reflects on one year as Canada’s PM  
Published on Oct 19, 2016
Live from Ottawa, we discuss the past year with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Justin Trudeau's Apologies
Published on Oct 15, 2016
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO) Season 3 Episode. The official website for Last Week Tonight With John Oliver on HBO, featuring videos, images, schedule information and episode guides John Oliver - Justin Trudeau's Apologies with Last Week Tonight.

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Hillary's Email Scandal is Heating Up!


Trey Gowdy On Hillary's Treason Email Scandal 'be in jail'
Published on Oct 20, 2016
Trey Gowdy On Hillary's Treason Email Scandal 'be in jail'

Trey Gowdy FLIPS on ICE director 'You can go to jail'  
Published on Oct 18, 2016

Trey Gowdy HUMILIATES AG Lynch over Lying under Oath  
Published on Oct 18, 2016
I'm a Former U.S. Government IT Professional. Hillary Clinton's Email Actions Flirt With Treason.
By Aaron Gardner
I am a Former U.S. Government IT Professional. Hillary Clinton's actions skirt the line with treason
Hillary Clinton has skirted the line with treason. I know this might seem like a very controversial thing to say on its face, but I assure you this is more than your average hot take.
On September 11, 2012, there was an attack on an American compound in Benghazi, Libya, which was run by our State Department and was the temporary home to our Ambassador, Chris Stevens.
Since that night, Clinton, her team at State, and the Obama administration have diligently fought against any details regarding the actions of our Government took during that attack coming to light. This, despite the fact all were caught peddling a lie as the catalyst for an attack on an American facility in Libya. A lie which attempted to blame the actions of militant followers of Islam, hellbent on establishing an Islamic Caliphate in the Middle East through Jihad, on Americans. At least those Americans who do not vote Democratic.
This set off a chain of FOIA requests from a variety of organizations all with the intent of providing transparency for a event that was, by all accounts, a tragic loss for our nation.
All the while, Clinton has claimed no wrong doing. The credibility of those claims has now begun to be seriously challenged by not just the Republicans, but also the mainstream media.
And they should be. We know for a fact Clinton held classified information on her private Home Brew server. We know that that Home Brew server wasn’t equipped with the proper security protocols to process or store that classified information.
I can also tell you that an organization which submitted a FOIA request specifically for Clinton’s private emails during the time frame surrounding the Benghazi attack, just received their first reply. As you might have guessed, everything they passed over was redacted and marked as classified. All of it.
Again, this isn’t a big surprise. The Secretary of State talks about classified stuff all the time, comes with the job.
What is absolutely stunning, and what makes me question whether Clinton has been so foolish as to stray into treason, is that Clinton made absolutely no attempts to secure her communications and treat them with the level of seriousness their classifications require.
I will note now for the record that treason is open to interpretation, but there are a few points of guidance that keep most out of the grey area in which Clinton may soon find herself. I will come back to this, but let me first establish my bona fides.
One month before the election in 2000 I was getting ready to end my time in the Army. Faced with the prospect of serving under the direction of Al Gore, a man who’d bolo a LandNav course in his own back yard, along with a bum shoulder, I had decided earlier in the year that I wouldn’t re-up my contract with Uncle Sam. Instead I would leave the world of Special Operations, jumping out of airplanes, humping radios and batteries, end parlay the comms skills provided by the Army into an IT career.
Fast forward a year and a half and I am rebuilding email servers, setting up classified security enclaves, dealing with encryption, and helping troubleshoot microwave and satellite communications in the Balkans, Kosovo and Macedonia to be specific. I spent nearly two years eating, sleeping, and working on secure communications such as those that would be used in such places as Afghanistan, or Iraq.
Speaking of Iraq, after a reprieve from living overseas in which I went back to college and then worked as an IT Contractor at an Army base, I shipped off to Baghdad in the early spring of 2006. Again, I worked with classified networks, this time in the function of a monitor. What that means is I watched a screen all night for network anomalies, determined if it was a threat or an equipment error.
Equipment error is often the case for issues on a network, a cable is accidentally unplugged, or, in the case of fiber, accidentally severed. While these are a general pain in the ass, IT Professionals can usually fix the issue with relative ease.
Now, a threat is something that makes an IT Contractor, or any Government employee, with a Security Clearance, pay attention. This could easily become a situation. Situations can get complicated. Complications can lead to classified data loss, or worse, classified data exposure. Classified data exposure usually ends with your security clearance being rescinded, which you will almost never get back, which in turn means your entire career in Government Contracting, of GS Employment, is finished.
Pack it in and hope you don’t have to appear before a Congressional Hearing.
I say all of this not only to brag a bit about my unknown career before I took a $25K pay cut to work in politics, but also to let you now that I have some knowledge on the subjects of classification, classified document storage, and classified networks.
This prior career really does give me a broader understanding of what has happened with Hillary Clinton’s Home Brew Classified Network. Notice I didn’t limit this to email network, or data network. There is a reason for that, but we’ll get to that later.
First, lets dive into a bit of history on defense. There is a Military theory called Defense in Depth. The United States didn’t create this theory, it was developed through ages of experience that included those of the Late Roman Army, the medieval castles with layers of defensive strong holds and offensive fighting positions, and even the Japanese defense of such places as Saipan, where my Great Uncle gave his life for America.
While this has long been in the tool bag of Military Strategists, the internet, and the growing dependency of our Military on technology, required a new application of an old defensive strategy on a new battlefield.
As applied to communication networks, whether classified or unclassified, Government or the Private sector, Defense in Depth comes down to one simple principle … a layered approach.
Let me put this in a way your average home computer user can understand: You buy a computer, you create a login and password. This is layer one. Now, you want to go online, so you call your local provided and set up internet at home, maybe wifi as well. But that is only as secure as your provider. So you install anti-virus, maybe you configure the router and wifi to use secure settings of some sort. This is layer two. Feeling confident, you browse to IJ Review, read a few posts, watch a video or two and go on to your next connected task with no issues.
This is how it works on the most basic level.
Now imagine instead that it's an entire email server, which you know will house classified material due to the very nature of your communications, and instead of putting the most basic layers of security on that server, which in this case would be at the bare minimum enabling the SSL security options, and this server, again by the very nature of your communications and the duties you perform, is connected to multiple other classified computers and networks, and you start to see how large a problem this is.
Essentially, the layered defense created to ensure no breach of classified materials occurs is weakened due to the lack of any mitigation at all on Clinton’s private server. If this were a castle with a moat and a drawbridge, Clinton’s server would be the drawbridge with no means to retract in the middle of a siege.
Consider as well the fact that at least one person within the communications sphere of Hillary Clinton’s Home Brew Classified Information Depot, Sidney Blumenthal, was explicitly banned from working with Clinton at the State Department by the Obama Administration. Combined with the lengths Hillary went to actively not secure her communication, one can’t help to think that she was either ok with the security risk to the nation she now wants to lead as Commander in Chief, unfit for office due to serious mental deficiencies, or both.
If the gravity has not yet fully taken hold of you, I must remind you I said communications networks earlier. Not email, not data. Granted, we could focus on just the breaches in computer and email security, that near confirmed fact that Hillary used the same computer for SIPRNET and NIPRNET (click the links) for days, but other aspects of communications are just as important. Especially phone communications, one of the easier targets to penetrate.
This is crucially important because Clinton no doubt took many phone calls in her capacity as Secretary of State which discussed classified information, including calls from places such as Benghazi, Libya.
How did she take those calls?
I can tell you that the standard procedure for this is something called a STU or STE. This is a secure phone that encrypts the call on both ends using disposable encryption, also on both ends, that is changed on a schedule in order to avoid decryption attempts.
That’s standard procedure, but again we are dealing with Hillary Clinton. From the scuttlebutt I have heard, Clinton was using an off the shelf BlackBerry - side note: ain’t that a metaphor.
Again this was all by Clinton’s own choosing, which of course was meant to protect her from legal scrutiny, to hide her actions from not only those in Congress from both parties, but the American people themselves.
Despite the protestations of such liberal apologists as Col. Morris Davis, protestations obviously based in ideology rather than any actual insider knowledge on how Clinton purposely evaded security protocols meant to protect the security of not only our homeland, but our front line defenses across the globe.
The decision to circumvent security protocols by Hillary, by the very nature of government, would have gone through various phases, various decision makers, and all of them were eventually overruled, more than likely by Clinton herself or one of her closest staff. This was done with knowledge that information classified as Top Secret would inevitably pass through, breaking the defense in depth created in the vast network of classified communications networks operated by the U.S. Government across the globe.
The attack on Benghazi, once played off as a spontaneous reaction to an offensive YouTube video, could have very well be planned from information captured from the extremely vulnerable Clinton Classified Information Cloud.
It wouldn’t take an genius to connect the dots between the cyber warfare actions of China, the cozy relations between the Ministry of State Security, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency, and every jihadist militant between Turkey, the Mediterranean, and the Persian Gulf.
Yes, I think Hillary Clinton’s actions skirt the line with treason. Did she know her actions to purposefully circumvent the security of United States could plausibly lead to the deaths of four Americans during a 13-hour siege on our embassy compound in Benghazi, Libya? I can’t say for sure, but she damned well should have given it more than a passing thought in her quest to avoid legal snags while being the country’s chief diplomat, which, I will highlight, were completely overt.
The FBI will continue to investigate, as will the Benghazi committee, and based on the outright deceit we have seen so far, I only expect it to get worse as the coverup continues to unfold.
Hillary Clinton’s days as a candidate for President of the United States may be coming to an end, possibly to be followed by the end of her days as a free woman.
Either way, I can’t wait to see “13 Hours.”
(FULL DISCLOSURE: I currently work for the Perry 2016 Campaign doing blogger outreach, but the post above does not represent the campaign.)
FBI Leak: Hillary Clinton Foundation Guilty Of Treason
by Sean Adl-Tabatabai in News, US
Posted on July 9, 2016
An FBI insider has come forward claiming that The Clinton Foundation has been found guilty of money laundering and fraud on a massive scale.
According to an insider who says he has “intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case,” FBI director James Comey decided not to indict Hillary due to the fact that the Clinton Foundation is a “massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people“. reports:
“There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down,” he revealed. “People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is.”
“Whether she will be [indicted] or not depends on how much info others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.”
Since then, both the FBI and the DOJ declined to press charges against Clinton, and other sources revealed the Clinton Foundation is now under scrutiny.
“The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imagine as a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people,” the source said. “Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece – albeit a big piece – of this massive sh*tstorm.”
Those implicated extends to the Justice Dept.
“The DOJ is most likely looking to save itself,” he continued. “Find everyone involved in the Clinton Foundation, from its donors to its Board of Directors, and imagine they are all implicated.”
This would explain why Bill Clinton forced himself on Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s plane at the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport last week; Clinton insider Larry Nichols said blackmail was likely involved.
“Bill Clinton met with Lynch, and he was there to assure her that when Hillary gets to be president she’ll be able to keep her job,” said Nichols on the Alex Jones Show Friday. “I would imagine he gave Lynch a slip of paper that had on it a couple of things about the career prosecutors that are working the case. What was on that? The things they have on them. The drugs, women, men, whatever.”
The source indicated the Clinton Foundation is likely a nexus of blackmail material keeping everyone in D.C. in line behind the Clintons – even those with tremendous influence.
“The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the email server,” he said. “We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation.”
“Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.”
The server was in Benghazi? Was that one of the reasons why the embassy was attacked, to destroy evidence on the Clinton Foundation?
Additionally, the source said the investigation took so long because FBI Director James Comey didn’t want to face the “Clinton Machine” and the “rest of Washington D.C.”
“…This case would explode into a million other cases if fully brought to light, and then we would be one agency competing against the entire government and a hoard of other interests,” he continued. “It is a very tense and uncomfortable position.”
Interestingly, the insider spoke more about Clinton’s relationship with President Obama, which seems frosty at times despite Obama currently campaigning for his former Secretary of State.
“Obama and Hillary do hate each other,” he said. “Hillary hates black people and Obama dislikes recklessness.”
On Thursday, Breitbart reported the FBI is “is still investigating Hillary Clinton in connection with possible corruption related to the Clinton Foundation.”
Also See:
 Is Trey Gowdy For Real?
19 September 2016

Saturday, October 22, 2016

Third Debate Between Trump and Clinton!


Hillary And DNC Busted! Caught Lying In Debate! Judge And NSA “The Big Deception”! Brazile Guilty!  
Published on Oct 20, 2016
Megyn Kelly prosecutes DNC Brazile. Brazile looks guilty as hell. Hillary told bold face lies in the Debate. Judge exposes the “Big Deception”! Directly contradicts Hillary and the rest of the DCN and liberal media. Whenever anyone in the DNC or liberal media is confronted with this issue they blame Russia. The entire narrative concerning Wikileaks data being false is blown out of the water by the Judge and William Binney former NSA. The Wikileaks data is so damaging that if the MSM would report on it, Hillary would be done! They will go to any extreme including War to stop the bleeding. 20 more days of these leaks will kill Hillary’s campaign and expose the extent of the corruption that Trump has been talking about in his speeches!
The last 5 minutes of the video is a clip that exposes the lies within our government that have been told over almost 200 years. It’s one of the best videos I have ever seen. Some of you may already be familiar with it. We have lost our country and Judge Napolitano is one of the very few people at a high level position in our legal system that has the guts to expose the truth! His show was cancelled and he was fired from FOX when he exposed 200 years of truth about our country in just 5 minutes.
Trump is exposing some of the lies and I’m fairly certain that he knows much more than he can disclose, because most American People can’t handle the truth!
William Edward Binney[3] is a former highly placed intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA)[4] turned whistleblower who resigned on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency. He was a high-profile critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration.
Binney continues to speak out during Barack Obama's presidency about the NSA's data collection policies, and continues to give interviews in the media regarding his experiences and his views on interception of communication of American citizens by governmental agencies. In a legal case, Binney declared in an affidavit that the NSA is acting in deliberate violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Your World Fox News With Neil Cavuto 10/20/16 Hillary Clinton New Wikileaks Emails  
Published on Oct 20, 2016
Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton debate 3: Who won? Analysis
Debra Killalea,     @DebKillalea
October 20, 2016
THE US presidential debates are over with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton facing off against each other for the third and final time.
The debate, moderated by Fox News anchor Chris Wallace, saw the two presidential hopefuls exchange barbs in a feisty face off, but without a handshake exchanged between them.
It was Trump’s final chance to prove to Americans that he has the temperament and ability to win the White House race.
It was also a chance for Clinton to appeal to younger voters who still see her rival as a chance for change.
The 90-minute debate which covered the economy, social issues and foreign policy among other issues pitted the businessman against the politically experienced Clinton.
But who really came out on top?
According to Aaron Connelly, a research fellow at the Lowy Institute for International Policy, Clinton fared better when it came to policy.
He said Trump still managed to deliver a few knocks to his rival, although stressed the real winner wouldn’t emerge until polls came out in a few days time.
Mr Connelly said this final debate was similar to the first in that it showed Trump was his own worst enemy.
Not only did he allow himself to be baited by Clinton at several points but he played into her rhetoric that he doesn’t have the temperament to be Commander in Chief, he said.
Trump also didn’t do himself any favours with women voters calling Clinton “a nasty woman” while talking about winding back abortion rights
“That would have hurt him with women voters,” he said.
Mr Connelly said Trump’s claim that the election was rigged and his refusal to say whether he would accept the election result also damaged his chances of closing the gap with Clinton’s poll lead.
“The last time an election result wasn’t accepted was in 1860 and that led to a civil war” he said.
Mr Connelly said to suggest the system was undemocratic and would create unease with immigrants who came to the US to flee political instability.
“In the last 10 years only 35 examples of voter fraud have been found out of billions of votes cast,” he said.
“It’s not a problem that exists... the suggestion is damaging to democratic norms.”
Mr Connelly said Trump presented himself well at the Republican debates because he was up against several candidates and excelled at using zing and bravado.
“But speaking for more than 90 seconds, like today, and he loses that cohesion,” he said.
“His comments on Mosul were incomprehensible and he got key facts wrong.”
Mr Connelly said it wasn’t a great look when his rival had to explain Middle East policy.
However he said he thought the first 30 minutes of the debate was when Trump was at his best as questions surrounding the Supreme Court, abortions and gun control favoured him.
“His comments on trade though fell flat though,” he said.
“Clinton also pushed him on a lot of points, causing him to combust. He just got worse and worse.
“He is around 11 points down now and this debate did little to recover that divide.”
Professor Simon Jackman, chief executive officer of the United Studies Centre at the University of Sydney thought the third debate was a score for Clinton.
“She was especially powerful in baiting Trump’s temper and showing that he is unfit for office,” Prof Jackman said.
“Her comments that they were getting Osama bin Laden while he was filming Celebrity Apprentice would also have hurt.”
Prof Jackman said this debate, like much of the campaign, became quite personal at times and didn’t reflect well on either of them.
“This is the most personal and ugly campaign I have seen in my 40 years of lecturing American politics,” he said.
“The debate started out civil enough but didn’t last long at all.”
But there was one point where Clinton really shone and that was where she said Trump was always happy to blame everybody else for what went wrong.
Prof Jackman said she effectively managed to put Trump in a corner and contrast what he believed against everything else the US stood for, including respecting the election outcome.
“It was very purposeful and clearly well rehearsed,” he said.
“It was one of her most effective moments.”
When Trump spoke of Bernie Sanders criticising Clinton, Prof Jackman said she turned that on Trump by reminding him he said the Republican nominee was one of the most dangerous people to run for office in the modern age.
“In saying that Trump delivered some good blows especially on her email scandal and her levels of trustworthiness,” he said.
Prof Jackman said he felt Wallace gifted Trump questions surrounding the Supreme Court and the Republican nominee but didn’t build on that enough.
“The Supreme Court questions were good for Trump because it showed he was all that stood between him and Hillary Clinton making more left leaning judicial appointments,” he said.
While Clinton is leading in the polls, and has widened her gap, just how effective this debate has been won’t be known for a few days yet.
However, according to broadcaster CNN, Clinton won the third debate 52 per cent to 39 per cent for Trump.
Donald Trump Trounced Hillary Clinton in Second Debate, But...
By Chuck Baldwin
October 13, 2016
As debates go, it was a thrashing: Donald Trump totally dominated the second presidential debate, as Hillary Clinton was reeling on the ropes from the very beginning. Trump did very poorly in the first debate, as I noted in this column. But he was obviously much better prepared for this second debate, and it showed. Hillary was beaten so badly, a majority of the major news media actually STOPPED polling shortly after Hillary’s embarrassing performance because respondents were giving Trump a landslide victory, and they didn’t want to be forced to report it.
Trump finally brought up Benghazi and did a much better job of talking about Hillary’s criminality in destroying emails after she had been subpoenaed by Congress to produce them. He also courageously made a commitment to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Hillary’s obvious criminal conduct if he is elected President. That was a bold move and must have sent shock waves throughout the political establishments of both major parties. I hope it also put a little bit of the fear of God in FBI Director James Comey, as he has become party to the Clinton cover-up with his refusal to press charges against her.
Trump boldly stated his support for the Second Amendment, which forced Hillary to publicly defend her support for more gun control. He reiterated his support for the right to life of unborn babies, which forced Hillary to defend her pro-abortion position. And for the first time, I heard Donald Trump actually make a statement in support of the U.S. Constitution. And, of course, he continued pushing his economic positions of reduced taxes and less government regulation. He also continued hammering the so-called free trade deals like NAFTA and TPP.
Donald also did a great job of pointing out that Russia, Syria, and Iran are the ones that are truly fighting ISIS and that we should acknowledge it and support them in it. I don’t know that any other presidential candidate, Republican or Democrat, has or would ever admit that (except for Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan, of course). I give Trump big kudos for that one.
But the thing that sent Hillary reeling against the ropes was Trump’s courageous statement regarding Bill Clinton’s long history of abuse against women (including several alleged rapes) and Hillary’s culpability in providing cover for her husband’s abuse. Along with pressing the criminal cover-up in her deleted emails--and her culpability in the deaths of American soldiers and the American ambassador in Benghazi--the subject of both Clintons’ long history of abuse of women knocked Hillary for a loop. She never recovered.
The thing I continue to dislike about Trump, however, is his emphatic and continual support for what, in essence, is a burgeoning Police State in this country. His “stop and frisk” proposals and his repeated calls for religious profiling and increased police intrusions into privacy are a direct violation of the Fourth Amendment and portends further police abuse under a Trump administration. Unfortunately, this plays WELL to most conservatives and Christians.
People on the “right” have a HUGE blind spot when it comes to Fourth Amendment issues and all things “law and order.” On this issue, the Republican nominee could have been ANY of the contenders (excepting Rand Paul), and it would not have changed a thing. Republicans are notoriously anemic on the Fourth Amendment. If Republicans understood the Fourth amendment like they do the Second Amendment, America wouldn’t be staring a Police State in the face the way we are. And while the late Supreme Court justice, Antonin Scalia (the man Trump uses as the model for his future Supreme Court picks), was terrific on the Second Amendment and life issues, he was very inconsistent (sometimes even terrible) on Fourth Amendment issues.
Without a doubt, however, this was Donald Trump’s finest public showing.
There is a much larger issue that I am compelled to address. And, unfortunately, it is an issue that hardly anyone else is willing to talk about. So, what I say from this point on is probably going to make me very unpopular in many circles. So be it. It MUST be said.
What Donald Trump was recorded as saying eleven years ago is disgustingly repulsive to anyone who has a moral compass. And there should be NO defending it. Yes, Trump was willing to publicly apologize for what he said; and I give him credit for that. None of us is perfect. Certainly not me, and not you either. Regardless, that does nothing to change the seriousness of the situation. (And, no, I’m not overlooking the fact that the release of this recording was timed by the establishment to do optimum damage to Trump’s campaign; and it is also a fact that the establishment has damaging evidence against a variety of politicians--including the Clintons--that it withholds from the public. The hypocrisy of the establishment class is massive.)
And the seriousness of the situation completely transcends this election and even what Trump was recorded saying. Sadly, the ONLY thing people can focus on or talk about is the election. What Donald Trump’s behavior implies is never brought up--except by people who merely want to use it as a political ploy to help Hillary get elected.
Please bear with me, and let me explain.
Both sides of the political aisle are equally culpable in the destruction of our national character. Even “Christians” are caught up with political partisanship and are unwilling to address the underlying principles that are being sacrificed on the altar of an election.
I constantly hear conservative and Christian personalities excusing Donald Trump’s immoral lifestyle with a flippant comparison to Bill and Hillary Clinton’s immoral lifestyles. To be sure, it would be difficult for anyone to get any lower in the moral sewer than the Clintons. But is that our standard?
Let’s face the truth: Donald Trump has lived most of his adult life indulging in rampant narcissistic behavior. It is no wonder Donald has had so many marriages and divorces. In fact, if Trump is elected, he will be the first President in U.S. history who has had multiple failed marriages. The only other President to have had a divorce (one) was Ronald Reagan. Obviously, Trump would not be the only President to have bedded other women: including the obvious Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Baines Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, James Garfield, Grover Cleveland, Warren G. Harding, and Franklin D. Roosevelt.
But, to me, the current crisis is NOT Trump’s admitted immoralities; it is the lack of a moral conscience by society itself--including and especially by our “Christian” society.
I’ll say it straight out: our culture is in the toilet.
Granted, people are frail creatures: ALL OF US. We often come up short. The Bible itself is replete with examples of how even some of God’s finest men and women fell short. And pride, arrogance, and judgmentalism are things that surely sicken God. The Pharisees prided themselves in being moral puritans, but Jesus condemned them FAR WORSE than those who had been guilty of fleshly sins. So, God forbid that what I am saying here be taken in such a light.
That being said, the glaring problem uncovered by the serial adulteries of both Donald Trump and Bill Clinton is the way our culture has come to promote and accept the sexual objectification of women. Our society is eaten up with it.
Hugh Hefner’s playboy revolution of the sixties and forward has caused women to be seen as little more than sex objects. Everywhere one looks, women are treated as sex objects by our culture. Television commercials, television programs, billboards, sporting events, magazines, Hollywood movies, and even many “churches” are guilty of promoting such a culture. FOX News has turned news casting into the flaunting exploitation of women. I dare say that the modern feminist movement would never have come into existence without the flagrant and repeated sexual exploitation of women by narcissistic men. No, what Donald Trump did was not “just talk.” It was part of an entire culture dominated by the sexual exploitation of women.
What Donald Trump and Bill Clinton have done is bad enough. But what is worse is the way people make excuses for them. People on the left (including the media) completely ignore Bill’s exploitation of women, and people on the right (including Christians) completely ignore Donald’s exploitation of women. (Yes, I understand the difference between forced sex and complicit sex, and in this regard, the sins of Bill Clinton are far greater.) The only thing either side is concerned about is winning an election. Neither side is the least bit concerned about what the sexual objectification of women has done to women and to our country as a whole.
Neither does either side seem to be concerned about what this continual sexual exploitation of women is doing to the young women and girls of our country. These young women and girls see the constant promotion of nudity or semi-nudity of women and grow up with the impression that the only way for them to be popular or liked is to join in. Other young women and girls wrongly compare themselves to what they see being flaunted before them, which causes them to develop deep inferiority complexes--all being predicated on a phony, manufactured and degraded cultural standard of what “beauty” should look like. The damage being caused our young women and girls by our culture’s sexual objectification of women is incalculable.
And let me hasten to add: I see a BIG difference in the playboy lifestyle of a Trump or Clinton and the way others have had to endure separation for reasons known and understood only by God. No matter what the Pharisees among us say, not every divorce is created equal. Some people have a tendency to judgmentally lump every act of divorce into the same category; and that is very unfair. The Scriptures make a big distinction between those who fall into an act of immorality or those who must make decisions about love and marriage due to uncontrollable circumstances (I Corinthians 7) and those who are sexual predators. For example, there is a big difference in Holy Writ between the woman taken in adultery in Jesus’ time and the sexual predator sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, or the blessings of God upon Job with a second wife and family.
In reality, Donald Trump and the Clintons are mostly a reflection of what our society has become.
All of that said, however, if Donald Trump should be elected President (and at this point I think he will be unless the powers that be are able to somehow rig the elections, which is certainly possible), I pray that early on in his administration he will use the Bully Pulpit of his office to recall his past debauchery and use it as an example (and he has done this for other things such as the bankruptcy laws and tax laws that allow the wealthy to evade taxes) of how degraded our culture has become and then subsequently launch a national campaign to lead the men of America to stop the sexual exploitation of our women and give them back lives that are free of a societal condition that, in effect, has made them unwitting slaves to a double standard that no one should be forced to live under. If he would do that, he could possibly become the greatest President since Thomas Jefferson--providing he also casts off his seeming infatuation with a Police State, of course.
P.S. Sometime ago, I brought a message entitled “The Biblical Standard For Government.” And believe me, the Biblical standard for government is NOT what most Christians think it is. The principles contained in this message were commonly taught from the colonial pulpits at the time of our country’s founding. Sadly, they are seldom mentioned from America’s pulpits today.
In this message, I delve into the Biblical requirements for civil magistrates. I truly believe if these principles were being taught in America’s churches today, we would NOT be dealing with many of the problems currently confronting our country. Truly, the failure of America is a failure of America’s pulpits.
I believe this message would be beneficial to anyone who is concerned about good government--and how to obtain it.
Order the DVD message “The Biblical Standard For Government.”
[If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link.]
[I also have many books and DVDs available for purchase online. Go to Chuck Baldwin Live Store]
© 2016 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved
Chuck Baldwin is a syndicated columnist, radio broadcaster, author, and pastor dedicated to preserving the historic principles upon which America was founded. He was the 2008 Presidential candidate for the Constitution Party. He and his wife, Connie, have 3 children and 9 grandchildren. Chuck and his family reside in the Flathead Valley of Montana. See Chuck's complete bio here.
Also See:
First Debate Between Trump and Clinton!
29 September 2016

Friday, October 21, 2016

Bill Clinton's Son Speaks Out!


Bill Clinton 'Son' Danney Williams Holds Press Conference
Streamed live on Oct 19, 2016
Thursday, October 19, 2016: Danney Williams, who claims to be Bill Clinton's long lost son, makes a surprise announcement, appearing live in Las Vegas only hours before the third debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

Breaking: Hillary Freaks Out As Bill Clinton's Son, Danney Williams Breaks Silence In This New Video
Published on Oct 12, 2016
Sub for more: | Matt Drudge reports, CNN boss Jeff Zucker has directly ordered network staff not to cover shocking allegations made my Arkansas resident Danney Williams, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. Williams, give his first TV interview in this video today claiming to be Bill Clinton's biological son.
Danney Williams, Bill Clinton’s ‘Son’: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Paul Farrell
October 19, 2016
A man named Danney Williams, 31, has renewed claims his mother first made in the 90s. The claim is that he is the love child of Bill Clinton. It’s an allegation that has followed the Clintons around for nearly 24 years. Williams’ mother, an Arkansas prostitute named Bobbie Ann Williams, said in 1992 that Bill Clinton had been her only white client around the time she was pregnant. The story has been widely discredited but still gains traction in conservative media circles.
A few hours before the final presidential debate of the 2016 election season, Williams filed a paternity suit with the Clinton family.
In 1999, Star Magazine conducted a DNA test on Williams to see if he was in fact Clinton’s son. The results were negative. Though Williams says the test never took place. While the New York Daily News reported in 1999 that the tabloid’s results would likely be unreliable.
Here’s what you need to know:
1. Williams Was on Alex Jones’ Radio Show Where He Was Incorrectly Labeled as Having No Criminal Record

Williams first began appearing on conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ Infowars network in October 2016. Jones says of Williams, “You yourself got three children. No record. Hard working guy.”
A Smoking Gun report on Williams rebukes Jones’ claim that “Clinton’s son” has “no record.” The report also says that Williams has five children, not three. All of those children were born before Williams was 21. He also has a lengthy criminal record, according to the Smoking Gun. The website says that Williams was last released from prison in September 2015 after he was convicted of passing bad checks. Shortly after this release, Williams began his campaign to be recognized as Bill Clinton’s son.
Williams has other convictions for car theft as well as child support issues.
2. Williams Says That He Tells His Kids That Their Grandfather Was the President of the United States
In a video that was uploaded by Williams to his YouTube channel, he explains, “Recently I have been telling my kids that their grandfather was the president of the United States and they’re amazed by it, they’re like “No. Is it for real?” I tell them yes, he is my father and I will make sure you get to meet him one day.”
Williams also says in that clip that his mother was supported by Bill Clinton with $700 a month. That money, he says, was delivered to their home by an Arkansas State Trooper each month.
Also appearing in the video is Williams’ aunt, Lucille Bolton. She raised Williams because his mother was in-and-out of prison throughout his youth. Bolton said that she once took Williams to the governor’s mansion while Clinton lived there, she says the two were “chased” off of the grounds.
A claim put forward on Williams’ Twitter page alleges that Clinton had sex with Williams’ mother “13 or 14” times between 1983 and 1984. This claim also says that Clinton had an orgy with Williams’ mother and two other prostitutes at Clinton’s mother’s house.
3. On October 14, One of His Supporters Shouted: ‘Justice for Danney Williams’ at Bill Clinton During a Rally

As Williams’ continues his campaign amid Hillary Clinton’s campaign in the 2016 presidential election, a Williams’ supporter made himself known at a Bill Clinton rally. On October 14, that supporter can be heard shouting, “Justice for Danney Williams” repeatedly during a rally. Williams wrote on his Twitter page after the clip went viral, “I thank one of my supporters for chanting, “Justice for Danney Williams” at @billclinton event Friday. #ClintonKid.”
4. The Early Claims That Williams Was Clinton’s Son Were Pedaled by ‘Loose Cannon’ Activist Robert McIntosh
During Bill Clinton’s run for the White House in 2000, the allegations about Williams’ parentage first appeared. They were pedaled by a businessman from Little Rock who was frequently at odds with Clinton named Robert “Say” McIntosh.
The Daily Beast reports that during Clinton’s presidential campaign, McIntosh put posters in the Little Rock area that read, “The Hottest Thing Going: Bill Clinton’s Dick Will Keep Him From Running for President of the United States of America.” The poster was accompanied with a photo of Danney Williams.
An Accuracy in Media report on the scandal says that Williams “abruptly” ended his campaign in 1992. It adds that shortly after Clinton was elected as president, McIntosh’s son was pardoned by Arkansas’ acting governor.
5. There Were Rumors That Williams Might Be One of Trump’s Guests at the 3rd Presidential Debate

In the run up to the final presidential debate of the 2016 election season, rumors appeared online that Williams would be one of Donald Trump’s guests. He would have been accompanied by President Obama’s estranged and embittered brother Malik Obama.
Paul Farrell is an independent journalist and senior contributor to Heavy who covers breaking news and current events. He's from Ireland and lives in Brooklyn. 
CNN Orders Blackout On Clinton 'Son'
Drudge Report 
Wed Oct 12 2016

CNN boss Jeff Zucker has directly ordered network staff not to cover shocking allegations made my Arkansas resident Danney Williams, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. 
Williams, who is set to give his first TV interview today on
INFOWARS.COM, claims to be Bill Clinton's biological son.
"Jeff thinks it is a ridiculous hoax," a top CNN source reveals.
"I always felt bad about Bill Clinton not wanting to be in my life,"
Williams explains in a video released Monday. "Was it because I was black? Was there something wrong with me? It made me think sometimes even of suicide. It's not fair and it has been hurtful."
"Hillary, please do not deny I exist. I am your stepson."